Home-based, sole operator
Each educator runs care from their own home. No shared reception, no handover between shifts, no director walking the floor. The educator is the environment.
Why family day care
It has its own operational structure, its own regulatory surface, its own trust relationships, and its own failure modes. Every piece of childcare software on the market was built for centres first and awkwardly adapted for FDC second. That's the gap.
The structure
A centre has one building, shift rosters, shared rooms, and a director on site. FDC has none of that. Each educator runs care from their own home, supervised remotely by a service coordinator who might oversee 20 or 50 educators across a city.
Each educator runs care from their own home. No shared reception, no handover between shifts, no director walking the floor. The educator is the environment.
A service coordinator oversees 20, 40, sometimes 60 educators spread across a region. Oversight happens through documentation, visits, and trust. Not by walking down the hall.
Centre-based care is two parties: centre and parent. FDC is three: educator, service, and parent. Every record, every payment, and every compliance artifact flows between all three.
The gap
Centre software assumes a director on site. FDC has a remote coordinator overseeing dozens of separate homes. Oversight needs a queue, not a walkaround.
Centre tools manage room ratios and staff shifts. FDC educators work alone in their home. Rostering is irrelevant. Home safety assessments are not.
A centre reconciles CCS for one location. A service reconciles across 20-50 educators, each with their own session reports, attendance records, and subsidy claims.
In centres, one director holds compliance. In FDC, every educator independently maintains WWCC, First Aid, CPR, home assessments, and NQF evidence. The service must track all of them.
Centre parents interact with a reception and a daily app. FDC parents interact directly with the educator, often through WhatsApp. The trust surface needs to be formal without being corporate.
The regulatory reality
FDC operates under the same NQF, NQS, and EYLF as centres, but the compliance surface is different. Home-based settings have unique Quality Area requirements. CCS session reporting works differently when each educator is their own service unit. ACECQA assessments evaluate the service and the educator separately.
Quality Area 3 (physical environment) means something different when the environment is someone's home. Sleep, play, hazard management, and outdoor space all assessed differently.
ACECQA assesses the service and each educator separately. Both need evidence, both get rated, and a service's overall rating reflects the quality of its educator oversight.
Each educator generates their own CCS sessions. The service must reconcile across all of them. One missed session report from one educator can put thousands in subsidy at risk.
What twobabies does differently
We started with the FDC coordinator desk, the educator home, and the parent trust relationship. Not with a centre floorplan. Every screen, every workflow, and every compliance check is designed for how family day care actually works.
The coordinator command center is a first-class surface, not an admin panel bolted on. Risk visibility, educator onboarding, and financial oversight are the product, not afterthoughts.
Built for one person running care from their home, not for shift handovers in a centre. Daily tasks, proof capture, and compliance in one calm mobile-first surface.
A formal trust record that replaces WhatsApp groups and paper notes. Attendance, fees, incidents, and authorizations. Legible and official, not casual.
For family day care
We built twobabies because family day care deserves its own operating system, not a centre-based tool with the word "home" swapped in.